ArticleScientific reports2026
A big data approach to artificial intelligence driven predictive modelling for optimizing material properties in additive manufacturing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Two-Photon Lithography of 3D Inorganic Microstructures: Glass, Ceramics, Metals, and Carbon.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing application of Additive Manufacturing (AM) in key industries requires reliable predictions of Material Properties (MP) to ensure consistent part quality and performance. The complex relationships between Process Parameters (PP) and MP, along with the inherent uncertainty in powder-based AM methods, render reliable property prediction challenging. This paper presents a novel Multistage Transfer Learning Model (MTLM) for predicting MP in powder bed fusion-based AM. A model is recommended that combines Crystal Graph Convolutional Neural Networks (CGNN) and Bayesian Neural Networks (BNN) to correlate PP and MP with final properties. The model is proved on Titanium alloy 6 − 4 (Ti-6Al-4 V) as the test material, and it shows better prediction accuracy compared with traditional Machine Learning (ML) algorithms, with Root Mean Square Errors (RMSE) of 11.7 megapascal (MPa) for Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS), 8.9 MPa for Yield Strength (YS), and 0.021% for porosity. The model incorporates uncertainty quantification through Bayesian inference, providing confidence metrics important for industrial applications. Trained on 3,083 experimental samples and validated across different combinations of process parameters, the model demonstrates strong generalization, achieving MP prediction accuracies of over 93%. Real-time processing capabilities are proven by integrating big data analytics platforms to enable dynamic optimization of AM process parameters. The ability of the model to capture complex process-structure-property relationships, along with the quantification of prediction uncertainties, is a significant phase in computational materials science for AM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.