ArticleScientific reports2026
A pseudouridine-related prognostic model of colorectal cancer based on single-cell sequencing analysis and transcriptome analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urinary pseudouridine levels have been proposed as diagnostic biomarkers for various malignancies; however, their association with colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear. This study investigates the molecular mechanisms underlying pseudouridine-related genes (PRGs) in CRC. The study incorporated a training cohort (TCGA-CRC), a validation cohort (GSE87211), a single-cell dataset (GSE200997), and PRGs retrieved from public databases. Quality control was performed on the single-cell dataset, followed by cell type annotation. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) across distinct cell populations were identified. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was employed to screen module genes strongly correlated with PRG scores. DEGs between tumor and normal samples in the training cohort were also determined. Candidate genes were selected by intersecting DEGs from key cell types, tumor-normal comparisons, and WGCNA-derived module genes. A prognostic risk model was constructed using Cox regression analyses. Independent prognostic factors were identified through univariate and multivariate Cox analyses, integrating clinical parameters and risk scores, to establish a prognostic nomogram. Comparative analyses of mutation profiles, immune infiltration, and functional pathways were conducted between high- and low-risk groups, and molecular mechanisms of prognostic genes were explored. Additionally, pseudo-temporal trajectory analysis was applied to assess prognostic gene expression dynamics in key cell types. Seven cell types were annotated in the single-cell dataset, with T cells and epithelial cells representing predominant and functionally significant populations. A total of 116 candidate genes were identified by overlapping 4,762 DEGs from T cells, 4,525 DEGs from epithelial cells, 9,772 tumor-normal DEGs, and 2,990 module genes. A prognostic risk model incorporating three PRGs—BCL10, TAF1B, and WWTR1—was developed and validated across training and validation cohorts. Risk score, age, T stage, N stage, and tumor stage were recognized as independent prognostic factors for constructing the nomogram. Pseudo-temporal trajectory analysis revealed that TAF1B expression was relatively elevated at the terminal differentiation phase in epithelial cells. A pseudouridine-related prognostic model based on three PRGs was established and validated, offering a potential reference for CRC treatment and risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.