ArticleScientific reports2026
Enhancing chronic disease management: hybrid graph networks and explainable AI for intelligent diagnosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate and timely patient diagnosis in healthcare is both critical and challenging due to the vast complexity of medical data. This paper introduces a deep learning approach to patient interpretation and diagnosis, utilizing improved Graph Neural Network (GNN) methods within a collaborative recommendation framework. Traditional diagnostic systems often rely on rule-based or statistical methods, which may struggle to encompass the dynamic interplay of diverse patient features, medical history, and evolving medical knowledge. This paper presents three novel methods for patient interpretation and diagnosis by harnessing the power of GNNs within a collaborative recommendation framework. We developed the Graph-based Hybrid Recommendation System (GHRS), Graph Neural Network-based Collaborative Filtering - No Attention (GCFNA), and Graph Neural Network-based Collaborative Filtering - Yes Attention (GCFYA). A key novelty of our approach is applying GNNs to capture intricate relationships within patient data through adaptive, data-driven methods. This empowers a more accurate, interpretable, and collaborative approach to diagnosis, moving beyond traditional methodologies. Our system employs GNN-based Collaborative Filtering (CF) to model complex patient-patient and patient-symptom relationships within a comprehensive graph structure. This representation not only accommodates various types of medical data but also allows for the integration of external medical knowledge, effectively capturing nuanced disease manifestations and symptom patterns. Another significant innovation is the system’s emphasis on providing interpretable recommendations. It elucidates the rationale behind diagnostic suggestions, addressing a common challenge in healthcare where the reasoning behind recommendations is often obscured. Results on one real hospital dataset and two public datasets were evaluated and compared with other recommendation methods; our methods show better results in all evaluation factors. This interpretability is crucial for gaining the trust of medical professionals and ensuring the acceptance and adherence to recommended treatments. Furthermore, our focus on elderly patients, a demographic with unique healthcare challenges, and the inclusion of diverse factors such as family history, lifestyle, and past medical records, distinguishes our work. The complexity and variety of diseases in this context, as well as the presence of incomplete or missing patient information, make our approach particularly relevant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.