ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026
A multimodal machine learning approach to forecast upper limb motor recovery after stroke using kinematic and electromyographic data - A pilot-study.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing upper limb motor recovery prediction after acute stroke using EEG and subacute data.APL bioengineering · 2026Article
- Reliability, validity, and usability of an 18-item immersive virtual reality action research arm test: a validation study in stroke survivors.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundForecasting post-stroke rehabilitation outcome is essential to personalize therapeutic strategies. Traditional approaches rely on clinical assessment scales, which, while essential, may benefit from complementary objective measures. In this direction, robot-assisted assessment offers the unprecedented possibility of precisely collecting patients’ physiological signals, enabling a data-driven approach to recovery assessments. Leveraging the use of multimodal features collected during assessment sessions performed before and after one month of robotic rehabilitation, we developed a machine learning approach to forecast the upper limb (UL) motor recovery in stroke survivors after rehabilitation.
methodsThis study evaluated a 4-week rehabilitation program, using both standard physical therapy and the ALEx robot to promote UL motor recovery in 11 subacute stroke survivors, compared to 6 healthy individuals. Kinematic measures and surface electromyography (sEMG) were collected during a 3D reaching task involving six target points. From these tasks, 76 sEMG features, 18 kinematics features and 1 multimodal feature were extracted. To forecast the UL motor recovery post intervention, a two-step machine learning approach was devised: a machine learning regression model was developed and validated to predict the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for UL (FMA-UL) post rehabilitation, whereas an anomaly detection algorithm identified patients who exhibited limited or no motor recovery post intervention. The anomaly detection approach used a fully-connected autoencoder that identified patients with reduced recovery likelihood. The regression models, optimized via a nested Leave-One-Subject-Out approach, guided feature selection and refined hyperparameters to predict FMA-UL scores post intervention.
resultsThe optimized regression model achieved an RMSE in predicting the FMA-UL post intervention of 5.45. The autoencoder effectively identified patients with reduced recovery potential, showing a higher distribution of reconstruction errors for these individuals.
conclusionsThe findings confirm that combining kinematic and sEMG data improves motor recovery assessment. The proposed machine learning approach holds potential for aiding clinicians and therapists in identifying patients who are more likely to recover UL motor functions before rehabilitation begins. By accurately predicting recovery outcomes, this method can help guide the development of personalized therapeutic strategies, optimizing treatment planning in advance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.