Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41486155›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026

A multimodal machine learning approach to forecast upper limb motor recovery after stroke using kinematic and electromyographic data - A pilot-study.

Luigi Privitera, Michael Lassi, Stefania Dalise, Valentina Azzollini, Luca Maggiani, Adrian Guggisberg, Alberto Mazzoni, Carmelo Chisari, Silvestro Micera, Andrea Bandini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luigi PriviteraThe BioRobotics Institute and the Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy. luigi.privitera@santannapisa.it.
Michael LassiThe BioRobotics Institute and the Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Stefania DaliseNeurorehabilitation Unit, Department of Neuroscience, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Valentina AzzolliniDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Luca MaggianiDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Adrian GuggisbergDivision of Neurorehabilitation, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Alberto MazzoniThe BioRobotics Institute and the Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Carmelo ChisariNeurorehabilitation Unit, Department of Neuroscience, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Silvestro MiceraThe BioRobotics Institute and the Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Andrea BandiniThe BioRobotics Institute and the Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundForecasting post-stroke rehabilitation outcome is essential to personalize therapeutic strategies. Traditional approaches rely on clinical assessment scales, which, while essential, may benefit from complementary objective measures. In this direction, robot-assisted assessment offers the unprecedented possibility of precisely collecting patients’ physiological signals, enabling a data-driven approach to recovery assessments. Leveraging the use of multimodal features collected during assessment sessions performed before and after one month of robotic rehabilitation, we developed a machine learning approach to forecast the upper limb (UL) motor recovery in stroke survivors after rehabilitation.

methodsThis study evaluated a 4-week rehabilitation program, using both standard physical therapy and the ALEx robot to promote UL motor recovery in 11 subacute stroke survivors, compared to 6 healthy individuals. Kinematic measures and surface electromyography (sEMG) were collected during a 3D reaching task involving six target points. From these tasks, 76 sEMG features, 18 kinematics features and 1 multimodal feature were extracted. To forecast the UL motor recovery post intervention, a two-step machine learning approach was devised: a machine learning regression model was developed and validated to predict the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for UL (FMA-UL) post rehabilitation, whereas an anomaly detection algorithm identified patients who exhibited limited or no motor recovery post intervention. The anomaly detection approach used a fully-connected autoencoder that identified patients with reduced recovery likelihood. The regression models, optimized via a nested Leave-One-Subject-Out approach, guided feature selection and refined hyperparameters to predict FMA-UL scores post intervention.

resultsThe optimized regression model achieved an RMSE in predicting the FMA-UL post intervention of 5.45. The autoencoder effectively identified patients with reduced recovery potential, showing a higher distribution of reconstruction errors for these individuals.

conclusionsThe findings confirm that combining kinematic and sEMG data improves motor recovery assessment. The proposed machine learning approach holds potential for aiding clinicians and therapists in identifying patients who are more likely to recover UL motor functions before rehabilitation begins. By accurately predicting recovery outcomes, this method can help guide the development of personalized therapeutic strategies, optimizing treatment planning in advance.

Indexed as

ElectromyographyMachine LearningRecovery of FunctionStrokeStroke RehabilitationUpper ExtremityAdultAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPredictive Learning ModelsRoboticsKinematicsMachine learningRehabilitation robotsStroke recoverySurface EMGUpper limb recovery

Identifiers

PMID41486155
PMCPMC12825236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.