ArticleBMC neurology2026
Effect of deep brain stimulation on early-onset Parkinson's disease with mutations in a Han Chinese Mainland population.
Article in BMC neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emerging insight in genetics and therapies in young-onset Parkinson's disease (YOPD): a comprehensive review.Journal of neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe influence of genetic factors on the efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) remains unclear. This study aimed to analyze the effects of DBS in Han Chinese patients with early-onset Parkinson’s disease (EOPD) across various genetic backgrounds and to explore the differences in DBS responsiveness among patients EOPD with and distinct genetic profiles.
methodsThis retrospective study examined 48 patients with EOPD who underwent DBS. Patients were divided into mutation-positive (Mut+) and mutation-negative (Mut-) groups. Clinical evaluations were performed before and 24 months after DBS using the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale, Non-Motor Symptoms Scale for Parkinson’s Disease, and levodopa-equivalent daily dose (LEDD).
resultsIn the Mut + group, 16 patients with EOPD carried gene mutations: seven in PRKN, four in GBA, three in PLA2G6, one in LRRK2, and one in PINK1. Fifteen patients had no detectable pathogenic mutations (Mut- group). The two groups had similar baseline demographic characteristics and preoperative clinical features, except for a younger age at onset in the Mut + group. Both the groups derived benefits from DBS surgery, with no statistically significant differences observed between them in terms of motor symptoms improvement and LEDD reduction at 24 months post-DBS. Furthermore, DBS responses varied according to genetic subtype, with the PLA2G6 subgroup demonstrating relatively poor outcomes, especially in terms of non-motor symptoms and axial symptoms. Regarding non-motor symptoms, DBS showed no significant differences in non-motor symptom improvement between the two groups or among the various genetic subgroups.
conclusionsDBS is effective in improving motor symptoms and reducing the LEDD in patients with EOPD, regardless of their genetic background. However, patients with genetic mutations, especially in PLA2G6, may show a weaker response to DBS, highlighting the need for personalized approaches in DBS therapy for EOPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.