ReviewAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2026
Postoperative venous thromboembolism following cesarean delivery: prevalence, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.
Review in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism contributes to approximately 10% of pregnancy-associated deaths in the United States, with the highest incidence rate in the immediate postpartum period. Cesarean deliveries are associated with 4-fold relative risk of venous thromboembolism vs vaginal delivery. While most patients have some evidence of thrombosis in the pelvic veins after cesarean delivery, only a small proportion of patients (2.6-4.3 per 1000 deliveries) develop a clinically relevant venous thromboembolism. We outline the normal physiologic process of postcesarean hemostasis and the pathways by which aberrant balance in hemostasis may result in venous thromboembolism. With respect to diagnosis, vascular ultrasound remains the cornerstone of deep vein thrombosis diagnosis, while ventilation/perfusion studies and computed tomographic angiography are bedrocks of pulmonary embolism diagnosis. Venous thromboembolism prediction rules have not been validated in the postcesarean population and high rates of elevated D-dimer concentrations in the weeks after cesarean delivery limit their use. For the treatment of postpartum venous thromboembolism, low-molecular-weight heparin is the mainstay of acute management, but a wide range of alternative agents are now available, including warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants. In contemporary practice, there is large variation in the use of postpartum pharmacologic prophylaxis within the United States and internationally. Whether broader use of postpartum pharmacologic prophylaxis reduces the incidence of postcesarean venous thromboembolism with acceptable rates of adverse events (eg, bleeding complications) is unclear; observational evidence has come to conflicting conclusions. There is an urgent need for further study of the effectiveness of postpartum prophylaxis, and its optimal agent, dose, and duration, in randomized trials. Contemporary guidelines regarding which patients should receive postpartum pharmacologic prophylaxis are based largely on expert opinion; well-validated postpartum venous thromboembolism prediction models and patient preference data are needed to inform risk stratification and counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.