ArticleBMJ open2026
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences towards dental research training programmes and projects in undergraduate education in Tehran, Iran: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesDental research enhances students' understanding of evidence-based dentistry and improves clinical decision-making. This study aimed to explore the perceptions and experiences of students and staff regarding mandatory undergraduate dental research projects and identify the related challenges and facilitators.
designA qualitative study using focus group discussions and semi-structured individual interviews. Data were analysed using a framework approach and reported in accordance with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research.
settingSchool of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
participantsStudents and staff who were involved in undergraduate dental research projects. Seven sessions were held (three focus groups and four interviews). Participation was voluntary, and informed consent was obtained from all participants.
resultsThree key themes were identified: (1) attitudes towards the necessity and value of the research project; (2) barriers, including financial constraints, topic selection, mentorship issues, administrative and laboratory challenges, lack of motivation and time pressure; and (3) facilitators such as effective communication, revising course arrangements and improved financial support. Students and staff expressed differing views on the necessity, relevance and perceived benefits of the project.
conclusionsWhile both groups recognised the educational value of research engagement, the mandatory format, limited mentorship and resource constraints negatively affected motivation and project quality. Introducing flexible, interest-based or collaborative research formats and revising course timing may enhance engagement and learning outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.