ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2026
GP Consultations for Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) After mRNA and Adeno-Vector-Based COVID-19 Vaccination-An Exposure-Anchored Self-Controlled Cohort Study Based on Primary Healthcare Data From the Netherlands.
Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is labeled as an adverse effect of the adeno-vector-based vaccines AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson. We aimed to study whether there was an increase in general practitioner (GP) consultations for VTE after COVID-19 vaccination.
methodsAn exposure-anchored self-controlled cohort study was performed among COVID-19 vaccinated persons aged ≥ 12 years who were registered in the PHARMO Data Network and Nivel Primary Care Database in the Netherlands. The focal window was set at 28 days after each COVID-19 vaccination and the referent window at all time outside the focal window. Adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR), adjusting for SARS-CoV-2 infection, were calculated using Poisson regression.
resultsIn total, 2 133 853 persons were included. The highest increase in GP consultations for VTE was observed after Johnson & Johnson vaccination (aIRR: 3.14, 95% CI: 1.50-6.57), and a slight increase after Pfizer/BioNTech dose 1 (aIRR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.09-1.40). Risk groups were 12-60 year-olds with increased GP consultations for VTE after Johnson & Johnson (aIRR: 2.30, 95% CI: 1.44-3.69) and Pfizer/BioNTech (aIRR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.11-1.50), and in specific groups of males aged 12-60 years. Also, females using hormone-containing contraceptives or hormone replacement therapy (HRT) showed increased GP consultations for VTE after AstraZeneca (aIRR: 2.87, 95% CI: 1.13-7.33) and Pfizer/BioNTech (aIRR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.10-2.01).
conclusionIncreased GP consultations for VTE were observed after both vector and mRNA vaccination, in particular among males, 12-60 year olds, and females using hormone-containing contraceptives or HRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.