Trial reportAging clinical and experimental research2026
Swedish massage versus hip strengthening exercises for pain and function in older adults with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on "swedish massage versus hip strengthening exercises for pain and function in older adults with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial".Aging clinical and experimental research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKnee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a progressive disease that impairs mobility and quality of life in older adults.
aimsTo compare the effects of Swedish massage (SM) and hip strengthening exercises (HSE) versus control on pain, range of motion (ROM), and function in older adults with KOA.
methodsSeventy-five adults > 60 years with symptomatic KOA were randomized to SM, HSE, or control for 8 weeks of home-based intervention (3 sessions/week, 30 min each). Outcomes included pain, function, and ROM at baseline and week 8. Intention-to-treat analysis used ANCOVA adjusted for baseline values, with Bonferroni correction for two pre-specified comparisons (α = 0.025).
resultsSeventy participants completed the study (93.3%); adherence exceeded 85%. No serious adverse events occurred. Both active interventions significantly outperformed control across all outcomes. Compared with control, SM reduced VAS pain by an adjusted mean of 0.81 cm (95% CI 0.38–1.24, p < 0.001, d = 0.69) and HSE by 0.77 cm (95% CI 0.34–1.20, p < 0.001, d = 0.65). KOOS-ADL improved by 3.59 points with SM (95% CI 1.62–5.56, p < 0.001, d = 0.71) and 3.40 points with HSE (95% CI 1.43–5.37, p = 0.001, d = 0.67). Active knee flexion ROM increased by 3.42° (SM, p = 0.001, d = 0.73) and 3.69° (HSE, p < 0.001, d = 0.77) vs. control. DISCUSSION: This study shows SM and HSE as safe, feasible home-based options for pain relief in frail older adults with KOA.
conclusionsSM and HSE mitigate KOA pain, with SM uniquely enhancing daily function, supporting integration into clinical practice to promote independence and reduce healthcare burdens in aging populations. CLINICAL
trial registrationIRCT20150519022320N33 (August 12, 2023).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.