Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41485130›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2026

Physeal Allograft Transfer for Physeal Bars: A Safety and Feasibility Study in a Domestic Swine Model.

J V Korpershoek, C Chen, C V Nagelli, K L Lydon, M L Floren, D B F Saris, A N Larson, T A Milbrandt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Physeal Allograft Transfer for Physeal Bars: A Safety and Feasibility Study in a Domestic Swine Model.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

J V KorpershoekDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1069-665X
C ChenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
C V NagelliDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
K L LydonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
M L FlorenInnovation Department, AlloSource, Centennial, CO, USA.
D B F SarisDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
A N LarsonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
T A MilbrandtDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

AlloSourceMayo Clinic Wendel Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Premature physeal closure occurs following trauma, cancer, or infection. Current treatments have poor success rates. With recent pediatric donor tissue availability, physeal allograft transfer (PAT) can now be considered. The purpose of this study was to study the safety and feasibility of PAT in a large animal model. The aim of this study is to gather foundational data to inform future studies into the efficacy of PAT. Physeal defects were created in the distal femur of nine female domestic swine and treated with PAT from two male donor pigs, cementation, or bone autograft. Viability was assessed. After 3 months, physes were visualized using CT and MRI. Integration, tissue composition, donor DNA presence, and microscopic appearance were evaluated. Physeal allografts demonstrated 93% viability after procurement and preservation. All animals reached the 3-months study endpoint without gross deformations. No physeal bars formed in any group. Cystic changes were seen in experimental and control femurs. All groups showed disorganized tissue architecture without growth plate recapitulation. High allografts viability and structural integrity after procurement support the potential of this treatment. Although no gross deformities were found, transferred physes demonstrate poor integration and incomplete repair. The lack of physeal bar formation in the control group limits the reliability of the animal model for studying physeal allograft transfer. Lastly, this study was designed as a feasibility study and lacks power to compare treatment effects statistically. The efficacy of PAT for preventing growth arrest remains undetermined.

Indexed as

Bone TransplantationFemurGrowth PlateAllograftsAnimalsFeasibility StudiesFemaleMaleSwineallograftgrowth platein vivoPhysistransfer

Identifiers

PMID41485130
PMCPMC12765232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.