ArticleThe Veterinary record2026
Radiographic evaluation of gastroliths in a group of 49 juvenile saltwater crocodiles (Crocodylus porosus) in the UK.
Article in The Veterinary record, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastrolith ingestion is a known inherent behaviour in crocodiles. However, the interpretation of coelomic radiographs in crocodilians is challenging due to the limited informative literature in this field.
methodsDorsoventral coelomic radiographs of 49 juvenile saltwater crocodiles (Crocodylus porosus) were acquired twice, with an interval of 4 months. Any gastroliths present were evaluated and classified as sand, small, medium and large, relative to the size of the crocodile, by comparing the gastrolith size to the length of the 11th dorsal vertebral body.
resultsA total of 1971 gastroliths were recorded during the two examinations (mean of 21 per crocodile, range 0‒98). Small gastroliths were the most commonly recorded (94%). There was no significant correlation between weight gain and gastrolith numbers in either examination (p = 0.506 and 0.2034). There was a significant reduction in small gastroliths (p = 0.034) and a significant increase in medium gastroliths (p = 0.023) between examinations. LIMITATIONS: All radiographs were performed on a cohort of juvenile crocodiles at the same collection. Orthogonal lateral radiographic projections were not performed due to practical and ethical limitations.
conclusionsLarge numbers of relatively small gastroliths are likely a normal radiographic finding in juvenile crocodiles. As crocodiles increase in size, ingestion and retention of medium/large gastroliths may reduce body buoyancy to aid in increasing dive times and hunting of larger prey.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.