Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41485068›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2026

'Hacıhaliloğlu' apricot under simulated drought: morphological, physiological, biochemical, and flower biology responses.

Muzaffer İpek, Şeyma Arıkan, Duran Yavuz, Ahmet Eşitken, Lütfi Pırlak, Hüseyin Karlıdağ

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muzaffer İpekDepartment of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Selçuk University, Konya, Türkiye. mipek@selcuk.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5773-7236
Şeyma ArıkanDepartment of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Selçuk University, Konya, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4328-0263
Duran YavuzDepartment of Agricultural Structures and Irrigation, Faculty of Agriculture, Selçuk University, Konya, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9574-6929
Ahmet EşitkenDepartment of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Selçuk University, Konya, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6140-7782
Lütfi PırlakDepartment of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Selçuk University, Konya, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3630-3591
Hüseyin KarlıdağDepartment of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Malatya Turgut Özal University, Malatya, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9864-9507

Funding

Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu 120O669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Apricot is one of Türkiye's most important horticultural crops, accounting for approximately 21% of global production. The Hacıhaliloğlu cultivar, responsible for 90% of the country's dried apricot exports, is cultivated in Malatya, where declining precipitation due to climate change poses a significant threat to sustainable production. This study, conducted from 2021 to 2023, aimed to evaluate the effects of different drought irrigation regimes on the morpho-physiological and biochemical characteristics of Hacıhaliloğlu apricot trees under water stress. Four-year-old T-budded saplings were grown in pots and subjected to monthly irrigation treatments during the post-harvest period.The results revealed that drought stress significantly inhibited shoot elongation, reduced leaf size and dry matter accumulation, and impaired pistil development. The T

Indexed as

DroughtsFlowersPrunus armeniacaAgricultural IrrigationPlant LeavesWaterWaterAntioxidant enzymesApricotDrought stressFlower bud developmentPhysiological traits

Identifiers

PMID41485068
PMCPMC12866123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.