ArticleBMC medical ethics2026
Nursing students' experiences of patient information protection during clinical practice: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNursing students frequently access patient information during clinical practice and face ethical challenges in protecting patient information. This study aimed to explore and describe nursing students' experiences of patient information protection during clinical practice.
methodsA qualitative descriptive approach was employed to understand nursing students' experiences of patient information protection. Using convenience sampling, twenty-three nursing students were recruited from four nursing schools in South Korea. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and field notes until data were saturated. A qualitative content-analysis was conducted for data analysis. Rigor was ensured achieving four criteria including credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability.
resultsFour themes emerged from the data analysis. Nursing students experienced awareness of the importance of patient confidentiality, challenges of protecting patient information, inappropriate use of patient information, and need for more education about patient confidentiality.
conclusionsNursing students recognized gaps between their awareness and practice in terms of patient confidentiality. They reported the need for repetitive and case-based education on patient information protection. This study provides valuable data for developing strategies for patient information protection. Future research need to develop better pedagogical strategies to improve students' protection of patient information during clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.