ArticleBMC women's health2026
Prevalence and determinants of ability to refuse sex among women of reproductive age in Tanzania: evidence from national representative surveys.
Article in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWomen's ability to refuse unwanted sex is a fundamental dimension of gender equality and a key determinant of overall well-being. Despite its importance, there is limited evidence on the prevalence and factors influencing this ability in Tanzania. This study therefore aimed to investigate the prevalence and determinants of women's ability to refuse sex among reproductive-age women in the country.
methodThis study analyzed secondary data from the 2022 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey and Malaria Indicator Survey (TDHS-MIS), using a weighted sample of 9,090 women aged 15-49. Descriptive statistics summarized socio-demographic characteristics, while binary logistic regression identified factors associated with women's ability to refuse sex. Both unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals were reported, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
resultsThe study found that 69.6% of Tanzanian women of reproductive age had the ability to refuse sex (95% CI: 68.5%-70.4%). After adjusting for confounders, women's ability to refuse sex was associated with their education, primary (aOR = 1.354, p < 0.001), secondary (aOR = 1.74, p < 0.001), higher (aOR = 2.253, p = 0.024), and their partners' education, secondary (aOR = 1.269, p = 0.015), higher (aOR = 1.756, p = 0.009). Wealth (aOR = 1.241, p = 0.017), awareness of sexually transmitted infections (aOR = 1.368, p < 0.001), prior HIV testing (aOR = 1.714, p < 0.001), media access, low (aOR = 1.273, p < 0.001), medium (aOR = 1.612, p < 0.001), high (aOR = 1.954, p < 0.001), and contraceptive use, calendar-based (aOR = 1.311, p < 0.001) or other methods (aOR = 1.525, p < 0.001), were also positively associated. Women from Unguja (aOR = 0.425, p < 0.001) and Pemba (aOR = 0.376, p = 0.004) were less likely to refuse sex.
conclusionThe study found that a majority of Tanzanian women have the ability to refuse sex and that the ability to refuse sex is significantly linked to education, economic status, partner's education, access to media, STI awareness, HIV testing, and contraceptive use. However, women in Unguja and Pemba had lower ability to refuse sex compared to those in mainland urban areas. The findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to address regional disparities and promote equitable access to resources that support women's ability to refuse sex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.