Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41485036›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Social determinants of health and migrant access to public healthcare in Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Denise Martin, Daniel Granada, Mariá Lanzotti Sampaio, Atina Schipitosky, Eduardo Siqueira, Silvia Viodres Inoue, Maria Angela Conceição Martins, Fabiane Vinente Dos Santos, Regina Yoshie Matsue, Alexandra Gomes de Almeida and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Denise MartinUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. denise.martin@unifesp.br.
Daniel GranadaFederal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil. daniel.granada@ufsc.br.
Mariá Lanzotti SampaioUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. mlsampaio@unifesp.br.
Atina SchipitoskyFederal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Eduardo SiqueiraUniversity of Massachusetts, Boston, USA.
Silvia Viodres InoueUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Angela Conceição MartinsUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, Brazil.
Fabiane Vinente Dos SantosOswaldo Cruz Foundation, Manaus, Brazil.
Regina Yoshie MatsueUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alexandra Gomes de AlmeidaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Liria Maria Bettiol LanzaLondrina State University, Londrina, Brazil.
Evelyn Secco FaquinLondrina State University, Londrina, Brazil.
Vivianne Peixoto SilvaFederal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.
Silvia Angela GugelminUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, Brazil.
Lucimare FerrazSanta Catarina State University, Chapecó, Brazil.
Alejandro GoldbergNational Scientific and Technical Research Council, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Cristóbal Abarca BrownUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jeffrey LesserEmory University, Atlanta, United States.
Cássio SilveiraFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 403913/2021-7 ; 305522/2022-1Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2021/06792-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent decades, Brazil has emerged as a significant destination for migrants and refugees, contributing to a Global South-South migration trend. This trend is particularly notable for its influx from South and Central American countries, as well as African countries. Healthcare access in Brazil is universal through the Brazilian Health System (SUS). Although the existence of a social protection system is relevant, there are challenges to the law’s actual applicability in the country. Given the profound social and territorial inequalities existing in Brazil, the consequences of the pandemic have been particularly severe. The critical situations of social vulnerability have been intensified during the COVID-19 pandemic, posing a significant threat to the most impoverished populations, including international migrants. This article investigates how social determinants of health (SDH) shaped the experiences of international migrants in Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly regarding access to the public health system.

methodsDrawing on qualitative, multi-sited fieldwork conducted in six Brazilian states between 2022 and 2023, the study analyzes in-depth interviews with 84 migrants from Venezuela, Haiti, Bolivia, Angola, Colombia, and Syria.

resultsThe research highlights significant vulnerabilities linked to employment status, housing, and racialized exclusion, while also documenting widespread access to Brazil’s Unified Health System (SUS) for COVID-19 testing, vaccination, and care. Despite systemic barriers—including xenophobia, documentation requirements, and language barriers—the findings underscore SUS’s role as a vital mechanism for inclusion.

conclusionThe study argues that an SDH framework is essential for understanding the intersectional inequalities affecting migrant health and for developing coordinated, rights-based, and transnational public health responses to global crises.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health Services AccessibilitySocial Determinants of HealthTransients and MigrantsBrazilFemaleHumansMalePandemicsQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2Socioeconomic Disparities in HealthBrazilian public health system (SUS)COVID-19 pandemicInternational migrationSocial determinants of healthUniversal health coverage

Identifiers

PMID41485036
PMCPMC13059177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.