Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41485018›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026

Biomechanical effects of partial and full L4-L5 disc nucleotomy: a coupled musculoskeletal finite element modeling study.

Ali Haghighi, Navid Arjmand, Parisa Azimi, Aboulfazl Shirazi-Adl, Marwan El-Rich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ali HaghighiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Navid ArjmandDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. arjmand@sharif.edu.
Parisa AzimiDepartment of neurosurgery, Clinical Research Development Unit of Shahid Madani Hospital, School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
Aboulfazl Shirazi-AdlDivision of Applied Mechanics, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Polytechnique, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Marwan El-RichHealthcare Engineering Innovation Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN5596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPercutaneous disc nucleotomy effectively reduces intradiscal pressure, thereby alleviating pain caused by disc bulging and herniation. However, the resultant loss of nucleus pressure may disrupt the normal load-sharing among spine structures. In the absence of viable in vivo approaches, advanced computational modeling offers insights into the biomechanical mechanisms underlying recurrent post-nucleotomy pain, disc degeneration, and facet joint arthritis.

methodsA validated musculoskeletal finite element model of the T1-S1 spine was used to investigate the biomechanical effects of full and partial (1 cc nucleus removal) nucleotomies at the L4-L5 disc during upright standing and forward flexion.

resultsPartial nucleotomy caused minor to moderate changes at the treated segment that included reductions in the intradiscal pressure, disc shear load, and total ligament force, whereas peak annular stress-strain, disc bulge, facet joint forces, and local muscle forces increased. In contrast, full nucleotomy eliminated the intradiscal pressure, markedly reduced the disc shear load and unloaded the surrounding ligaments but at the cost of a 1.5- to 4.5-fold increase in the L4-L5 facet joint forces, up to 70% higher annular stresses, up to 0.93 mm greater disc bulging, and up to 25% higher local muscle forces. Load bearing shifted from the depressurized nucleus to the facet joints and surrounding annulus, with minimal impact on adjacent segments.

conclusionsThe unintended increase in post-nucleotomy disc bulging may impinge on nearby nerve roots, offering a biomechanical rationale for pain recurrence. Current findings underscore the biomechanical risks of disc depressurization and reinforce the clinical importance of nucleus-sparing and annulus-sealing techniques in nucleotomy planning.

Indexed as

Diskectomy, PercutaneousFinite Element AnalysisIntervertebral DiscIntervertebral Disc DisplacementLumbar VertebraeBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansWeight-BearingDisc deformationFacet joint loadsIntradiscal pressureLumbar disc nucleotomyMuscle forcesMusculoskeletal finite element model

Identifiers

PMID41485018
PMCPMC12781252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.