ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
Biomechanical effects of partial and full L4-L5 disc nucleotomy: a coupled musculoskeletal finite element modeling study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in biomechanical modeling of lumbar spine diseases and tumors: gaps, opportunities, and AI integration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPercutaneous disc nucleotomy effectively reduces intradiscal pressure, thereby alleviating pain caused by disc bulging and herniation. However, the resultant loss of nucleus pressure may disrupt the normal load-sharing among spine structures. In the absence of viable in vivo approaches, advanced computational modeling offers insights into the biomechanical mechanisms underlying recurrent post-nucleotomy pain, disc degeneration, and facet joint arthritis.
methodsA validated musculoskeletal finite element model of the T1-S1 spine was used to investigate the biomechanical effects of full and partial (1 cc nucleus removal) nucleotomies at the L4-L5 disc during upright standing and forward flexion.
resultsPartial nucleotomy caused minor to moderate changes at the treated segment that included reductions in the intradiscal pressure, disc shear load, and total ligament force, whereas peak annular stress-strain, disc bulge, facet joint forces, and local muscle forces increased. In contrast, full nucleotomy eliminated the intradiscal pressure, markedly reduced the disc shear load and unloaded the surrounding ligaments but at the cost of a 1.5- to 4.5-fold increase in the L4-L5 facet joint forces, up to 70% higher annular stresses, up to 0.93 mm greater disc bulging, and up to 25% higher local muscle forces. Load bearing shifted from the depressurized nucleus to the facet joints and surrounding annulus, with minimal impact on adjacent segments.
conclusionsThe unintended increase in post-nucleotomy disc bulging may impinge on nearby nerve roots, offering a biomechanical rationale for pain recurrence. Current findings underscore the biomechanical risks of disc depressurization and reinforce the clinical importance of nucleus-sparing and annulus-sealing techniques in nucleotomy planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.