ReviewJournal of intensive care2026
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for tropical infections: a scoping review.
Review in Journal of intensive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExtracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for infectious causes of refractory cardiopulmonary failure is established as appropriate therapy in high-income countries. Its use in low- and middle-income nations for tropical infections is not well-studied, however, perhaps because most of these countries have not been historically able to offer ECMO support. Tropical infections remain an important cause of global morbidity and mortality, but the role of ECMO is poorly described.
methodsWe identified a list of viral, bacterial, fungal, and parasitic infections that qualified as tropical infectious diseases. These included infections that were either a World Health Organization (WHO) designated Neglected Tropical Disease (NTD) or an infectious disease with a higher prevalence in the Tropics than elsewhere. We conducted a comprehensive review of existing literature regarding ECMO use to support these infections.
resultsMultiple viral, bacterial, fungal, and parasitic tropical infections have been supported by ECMO with varying success. leptospirosis, melioidosis, and tuberculosis are conditions suitable for venovenous ECMO support with frequent use in the literature and reported survival as high as 84% in Leptospirosis. Venoarterial ECMO has been successfully used in American trypanosomiasis-related cardiogenic shock as a bridge to transplant, with one center reporting a 71% survival rate. Dengue and malaria have been successfully supported with both venovenous and venoarterial ECMO. Mortality is relatively high (> 65%) in patients who receive ECMO for Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome. ECMO has also supported Echinococcal infections perioperatively. There are multiple tropical infections where ECMO use has not been published.
conclusionAs the use of ECMO expands globally, more patients with tropical infections may require ECMO in both endemic and non-endemic settings. We present a scoping review on the evidence base of ECMO use to support tropical infectious diseases, with data regarding feasibility in specific disease processes as well as clinical considerations for tropical diseases on the ECMO circuit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.