ArticleBMC global and public health2026
Longitudinal changes in processed food intake and their daily caloric contribution among Ghanaian populations living in Ghana and Europe: findings from the prospective Research on Obesity and Diabetes among African Migrants (RODAM) cohort study.
Article in BMC global and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDietary changes towards increased consumption of processed and ultra-processed foods are major contributors to obesity and non-communicable diseases worldwide. However, limited data exist on the intake of processed foods among Ghanaians living in Ghana and their migrant counterparts living in Europe. This study assessed changes in the intake of processed foods and their corresponding energy contributions among different Ghanaian populations.
methodsData were collected from the Research on Obesity and Diabetes among African Migrants-prospective (RODAM-Pros) cohort study, which recruited Ghanaians living in rural and urban Ghana and Ghanaian migrants living in Amsterdam, the Netherlands between baseline (2011-2015) and follow-up (2019-2021). Dietary intake was assessed using standardized food frequency questionnaires. Foods were regrouped according to the NOVA classification, a system that categorizes food based on the degree of processing. Paired sample t-tests were used to determine the differences in mean daily intake (grams) of foods and energy contribution between baseline and follow-up.
resultsCompared with baseline, ultra-processed food consumption decreased significantly among urban Ghanaians (-37.6%, -97.57 g/day, 95% confidence interval (CI) -129.66 to -65.48, p < 0.001) and migrants in Amsterdam (-31.1%, -168.90 g/day; 95%CI -241.54 to -96.26, p < 0.001) with no significant change in rural Ghana. The percentage of total energy from ultra-processed foods changed from 9.6 to 9.0% (p = 0.136) in rural Ghana, 15.9% to 13.9% (p < 0.001) in urban Ghana and 13.4% to 13.0% (p = 0.539) in Amsterdam. Conversely, processed food consumption increased across all sites: by 52.4% (+ 149.31 g/day, 95%CI127.70 to 170.92, p < 0.001) in rural Ghana, 31.4% (+ 96.67 g/day, 95%CI 75.15 to 118.19, p < 0.001) in urban Ghana and 29.0% (+ 62.91 g/day, 95%CI 44.18 to 81.63, p < 0.001) in Amsterdam. The percentage of total energy from processed food increased significantly from 20.8 to 39.5% (p < 0.001) in rural Ghana, 23.6% to 33.5% (p < 0.001) in urban Ghana and 7.2% to 12.9% (p < 0.001) among migrants.
conclusionsAcross all Ghanaian population groups studied, dietary intake has shifted towards higher intake and caloric contribution of processed foods, while ultra-processed food consumption has declined in urban and migrant settings. Further research is needed to identify the drivers of these changes and their implications for cardio-metabolic health among Ghanaian populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.