ArticleBMC medical education2026
Perceived impact of advanced clinical skill Building program for women's health: a retrospective review of a public-private partnership model.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA Public-Private Partnership is commonly defined as a mutual partnership agreement between a public-serving organization and a private organization to strengthen capacity for either a singular need or aimed at larger systems strengthening. In Pakistan, several healthcare initiatives are planned to scale systems strengthening using this model, but there is a dearth of programs to support the women’s health workforce capacity. Although the volume of patients is high in public sector organizations, they have limited opportunities to develop their advanced clinical skills.
objectiveThis study aims to explore the perceived impact of a one-year hybrid advanced clinical skill-building program based in three women’s healthcare subspecialities, including Maternal Fatal Medicine, Gynaeoncology, and Urogynaecology, for public sector AMC clinical faculty under the mentorship of private AMC faculty. METHODOLOGY: Program evaluation was done using an observational study design to explore the program’s percieved impact and effectiveness, compare perceived competency scores, and gauge the experiences of the participants. The data was collected as part of their training using structured Google Forms, which had questions customized to explore the program’s effectiveness, with the written information that it will be used for scholarly and research purposes.
resultsAll participants perceived the positive impact of the program on their clinical skills for detecting and treating cancers, including ovarian, endometrial, vulvar, and cervical cancer. They reported themselves as proficient in performing procedures like slings of SUI, Sacrospinous Fixation, Abdominal Sacropexy, and fistula repair. Overall, participants perceived that the program enhanced their skills pertinent to their subspeciality, acquired new knowledge, and found clinical mentorship supportive in applying theoretical concepts into practical skills.
conclusionThis evidence showed a positive impact on subspeciality skills on women’s health management and knowledge of the participants enrolled in the program, highlighting the importance of Public-Private Partnership models for workforce capacity development. This could be one of the models if adapted in Pakistan and other lower-middle-income countries, that can yield benefits in bridging the skills enhancement gap that exists in the women’s health fraternity. However, the small sample size and self-reported data may limit the generalizability of the study’s findings, despite showing a model that can be adapted, implemented, and large-scale and longitudinal studies can also be planned around the same.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.