Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41484948›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

Rapid assessment of the factors contributing to the increase in maternal mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Latin American region.

Evelina Chapman, Silvina Ramos, Mariana Romero, Guido Sciurano, Jim Ricca, Gloria Metcalfe, Jovita Ortiz Contreras, Joaquín Gómez Dávila, Daniel Camilo Aguirre Acevedo, Jorge Hermida Cordova and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Evelina ChapmanCenter for the Study of State and Society, CEDES, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Silvina RamosCenter for the Study of State and Society, CEDES, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mariana RomeroCONICET - Center for the Study of State and Society, CEDES, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Guido SciuranoCenter for the Study of State and Society, CEDES, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Jim RiccaJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. jricca1@jh.edu.
Gloria MetcalfeJhpiego, MNH Consultant, Baltimore, USA.
Jovita Ortiz ContrerasWomen's and Newborn Health Promotion Department, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Joaquín Gómez DávilaNACER Group, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Daniel Camilo Aguirre AcevedoNACER Group, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Jorge Hermida CordovaFoundation for Health Services Research and Management, FIGESS, Quito, Ecuador.
Alma Virginia Camacho-HubnerUNFPA Latin America and the Caribbean Regional Office, Regional Adviser in Sexual and Reproductive Health, Clayton, Panama.

Funding

United States Agency for International Development 7200AA20CA00002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 infection in pregnant women was known to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality in Latin America and the Caribbean as a consequence of comorbidity and disruption in the supply and use of health services.

methodsA multi-country qualitative study was carried out in Chile, Colombia, and Ecuador to investigate the factors contributing to maternal mortality in the period March 2020 - July 2021. Four sources were analyzed: health policy documents and interviews with decision-makers, service providers of health and relatives of women who died due to maternal causes during the aforementioned period. The information collected was coded according to dimensions of the SURE Collaborative model (Supporting the Use of Research Evidence Collaborative) for the analysis of the implementation of health policies; and their implementation was analyzed by applying the Three Delays model. Sixty-two policy documents were analyzed, and 21 interviews with decision makers, 30 interviews with service providers and 28 interviews with relatives of women who died from maternal causes were conducted.

resultsThe most relevant findings were the change in the maternal and reproductive health care model with the disruption of primary health care; the prioritization of emergency care for patients affected by COVID-19; and the fear of pregnant women to seek health services. The atomization of health management and the problems of communication/dissemination of the measures aimed at the general population and health teams generally undermined the provision of quality maternal and reproductive health services.This was exacerbated by socioeconomic vulnerability and lack of systematic policy implementation, as exemplified by the uneven rollout of telemedicine and home visits. Resource and skill gaps affected both the healthcare system and service users, particularly impacting the third delay in the maternal and reproductive health continuum. Deficiencies in infrastructure, supplies, human resources, and their protection further compounded these challenges.

conclusionVarious factors affected the availability, use, and quality of maternal, and reproductive health services during the COVID 19 pandemic. Access to timely quality maternal health care was severely affected. STUDY REGISTRATION: The study protocol was registered on the OSF storage website (Chapman et al. 2022. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/36JQD ).

Indexed as

COVID-19Maternal Health ServicesMaternal MortalityPregnancy Complications, InfectiousAdultChileColombiaEcuadorFemaleHealth PolicyHealth Services AccessibilityHumansLatin AmericaPregnancyQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2COVID-19Health policyImplementationMaternal healthMaternal mortalityReproductive healthThree delays model

Identifiers

PMID41484948
PMCPMC12828971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.