Trial reportJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026
Personalized high-intensity temporal interference stimulation decouples cerebellar networks to enhance implicit learning.
Trial report in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Modulation of cognitive and motor functions by temporal interference stimulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and variability.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDespite the central role of deep brain structures such as the striatum in motor learning, existing noninvasive stimulation methods are hindered by limited depth and precision. Temporal interference (TI) stimulation presents the potential for precise, individualized modulation of deep regions. However, how TI stimulation influences deep brain activity and large-scale network reorganization to facilitate motor learning is still unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify these mechanisms by investigating how personalized, high-intensity TI targeting the striatum modulates neural activity and enhances motor learning.
methodsTwenty-six healthy right-handed male participants were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled crossover study. Each participant received both TI and sham stimulation targeting the right striatum (10 mA, Δf = 20 Hz) through an individualized electrode montage. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and serial reaction time (SRT) task performance were assessed before and after each intervention. Neural analyses included static and dynamic fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (fALFF) in the target region, structural connectivity (SC)–functional connectivity (FC) coupling and topological metrics across six major brain networks, as well as brain-behavior correlations related to learning performance.
results(1) Target region activity: TI stimulation significantly increased both static and dynamic fALFF in the right striatum (Cohen’s d = 0.49, p = 0.016; Cohen’s d = 0.39, p = 0.035). (2) Brain network reorganization: Compared with the Sham group, the TI group exhibited significantly reduced SC-FC coupling in the cerebellar network (CN) (t = – 2.279, Cohen’s d = -0.82, p = 0.027, FDR corrected). TI stimulation significantly enhanced nodal degree in the cerebellar network (CN) and nodal efficiency the cingulo-opercular network (CON) (FDR corrected with Bonferroni correction, p < 0.0083) following the stimulation. Behavioral performance: The TI stimulation significantly improved performance in second implicit learning (SIL) after stimulation (Cohen’s d = 0.47, p = 0.043). Brain-behavior correlation: Changes in SC-FC coupling in the CN were significantly negatively correlated with improvement in SIL (r = – 0.372, p = 0.040).
conclusionPersonalized high-intensity TI of the striatum enhances deep target activity and promotes selective network reorganization, particularly by reducing SC-FC coupling and strengthening intra-network connectivity in the CN. These network-level modulations underlie improved implicit learning performance, highlighting the potential of TI neuromodulation as a precise and effective approach for promoting motor learning by targeting deep nuclei and large-scale brain networks. Trial registration number ChiCTR2500098699.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.