ArticleHead & face medicine2026
Application of 3D-Printed nasal models in lacrimal surgery training.
Article in Head & face medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of 3D-printed nasal models for training in nasal endoscopic examination and artificial lacrimal duct intubation, while also evaluating trainees' learning experience and skill improvement.
methodsA nasal model replicating anatomical structures was constructed using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printing based on adult nasal CT data. Twenty-four ophthalmologists subsequently underwent training involving simulated nasal endoscopic procedures and artificial lacrimal duct intubation on these models. Pre- and post-training practical assessments included the anatomical identification rate, nasal endoscopic operation time, and the success rate of artificial lacrimal duct intubation. A 5-point Likert scale questionnaire was used to measure participants' learning outcomes and satisfaction.
results3D-printed model accurately replicated nasal anatomical details, encompassing the nasal cavity, nasopharyngeal structures, and precise nasolacrimal duct opening localization. Following training, participants demonstrated significantly improved anatomical identification rates (p < 0.0001) and substantially reduced endoscopic operation times (p < 0.001), further achieving a 95.8% (23/24) qualification rate for lacrimal duct implantation positioning. Notably, questionnaire feedback indicated that 91.7% of trainees agreed the model enhanced anatomical understanding; 87.5% affirmed its haptic feedback approximated real surgery; 95.8% reported increased surgical confidence; and 91.7% endorsed its use for pre-operative training.
conclusions3D-printed nasal model offers a high-fidelity, reusable platform for nasal endoscopy and lacrimal surgery training, effectively advancing trainees' operative skills and confidence-thus demonstrating significant potential for clinical dissemination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.