ArticleJournal of eating disorders2026
Mental health literacy and stigma towards eating disorders in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEating disorders (EDs) are complex mental health conditions influenced by genetic, psychological, and sociocultural factors. In Saudi Arabia, rising ED prevalence among youth underscores the need for early diagnosis, increased awareness, and targeted intervention. This study examined the relationship between Mental Health Literacy (MHL) and EDs stigma within the Saudi population.
methodsUtilizing a cross-sectional design, data were collected from 370 participants across all Saudi provinces through a convenience sampling method. Data analysis was conducted by the R software version 4.2.2.
resultsFindings from this study showed generally high MHL and low to moderate stigma. There was a significant inverse relationship between MHL and stigma. Unadjusted linear regression indicated that higher MHL was associated with lower ED stigma. Other predictors of greater stigma included male gender, older age, being married, employment in the private sector, and higher income. Exposure to EDs, such as knowing someone with an ED or having self-diagnosed, was associated with reduced stigma.
conclusionsThe findings of this study underscore the central role of MHL in mitigating stigma toward EDs. Enhancing public education about EDs and promoting accurate understanding may reduce stigmatizing attitudes, improve early intervention, and support better health outcomes in Saudi Arabia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.