ArticleBMC medical education2026
Turkish medical students' perspectives on the advantages and disadvantages of telemedicine: scale development and psychometric evaluation.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe rise of digital technology and the COVID-19 pandemic have accelerated the adoption of telemedicine, yet its integration into medical education remains limited. Understanding the perceptions of future physicians is vital for the sustainable implementation of these services and for developing evidence-based telemedicine training programs. This study aims to assess the awareness and perception of telemedicine among medical students in Türkiye and provide empirical evidence to inform curriculum development.
methodsThis nationwide survey included 810 medical students from six universities in Türkiye. A valid and reliable 19-item questionnaire was developed to measure participants’ perceptions of telemedicine. The questionnaire used a 5-choice Likert-type scale. The data were analyzed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to determine the scale’s validity and reliability.
resultsThe final 11-item scale demonstrated strong validity and reliability, with a two-factor structure: “Advantages of Telemedicine” and “Disadvantages of Telemedicine.” The results showed that students largely perceive telemedicine as beneficial, particularly for preventive health services. However, they also expressed concerns, with the highest-rated disadvantage being that telemedicine might create a distance between the doctor and patient. The students rated “increased health inequalities” as the lowest concern. These findings reveal specific competency gaps and training needs that should be addressed in medical curricula.
conclusionThe findings suggest that medical students in Türkiye hold a generally positive view of telemedicine, recognizing its potential advantages in healthcare. While they are aware of some ethical concerns, such as the potential for a distant doctor-patient relationship, they see telemedicine as a tool to reduce health inequalities. This validated scale provides a foundation for designing targeted telemedicine training programs, assessing educational outcomes, and identifying specific competencies that require emphasis in medical school curricula. We propose a competency-based framework and specific pedagogical approaches to prepare future physicians for effective telemedicine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.