ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026
PLysPTM-HGNN: predicting lysine PTM sites of proteins using hybrid graph neural networks.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- PMPIHGLL: predicting metabolite-protein interactions using dual hypergraph convolutional networks and large language models.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Identification of Candidate Serum miRNA Features for Pan-Cancer and Cancer Type Classification.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Predicting circRNA subcellular localization by fusing circRNA sequence and network information.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProtein post-translational modification (PTM) is a critical biological process that occurs after protein synthesis and has key roles in several biological processes. Among these, lysine modifications include multiple types and have received considerable attention. Most existing computational models predict whether a specific lysine site in a protein sequence corresponds to a lysine modification type by extracting features from a short peptide segment centered on that site. Therefore, information from the full protein sequence is not used.
resultsIn this study, we gave a different direction for investigating lysine modifications. A computational model, PLysPTM-HGNN, was designed to identify lysine modification types at the protein level. Full protein sequence information was used to derive three feature types: gene ontology features, large language model features, and position-specific scoring matrix features. These features were refined separately through a linear transformation, a hybrid graph neural network, and a convolutional neural network combiner, after which they were concatenated and passed into a fully connected layer for prediction. Cross-validation results showed that the AUROC and AUPR were approximately 0.84 and 0.68, respectively, indicating strong predictive performance.
conclusionsPLysPTM-HGNN outperformed several existing protein subcellular localization models and models based on traditional multi-label classification algorithms. This model provides a useful tool for studies of lysine modifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.