ArticleBMC medical research methodology2026
Cluster minimal sufficient balance (CMSB): an efficient covariate balancing randomization method for cluster randomized trials.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCluster randomized trials (CRTs) require balanced baseline covariates to yield unbiased estimates of treatment effects. Existing approaches such as constrained randomization can improve balance but may compromise allocation randomness. We introduce Cluster Minimal Sufficient Balance (CMSB), a cluster randomization method designed to enhance covariate balance while preserving allocation randomness and computational efficiency.
methodsCMSB integrates dynamic imbalance monitoring with conditional biased randomization into a single procedure. The method accommodates both continuous and categorical covariates and was evaluated through simulation studies comparing its performance with constrained randomization, simple randomization, block randomization, stratified randomization, and minimization across varying numbers of clusters and covariate dimensions. An empirical application further assessed its practical utility.
resultsIn high-dimensional settings with 10 covariates, CMSB achieved a 45% greater improvement in covariate balance compared to constrained randomization, while maintaining near-optimal allocation randomness (correct guess probability: 49.79% versus 61.03% for minimization). CMSB reduced mean allocation time from over 100 s under constrained randomization to 0.116 s per allocation, even when simulating up to 2,000 randomization schemes. In the empirical application, CMSB demonstrated a 76% improvement in covariate balance relative to simple randomization.
conclusionsCMSB effectively balances the competing demands of covariate balance, allocation randomness, and computational efficiency in cluster randomized trials. Its ability to handle high-dimensional covariates makes it particularly suitable for large-scale trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.