ArticleMemory & cognition2026
The veil of distraction: Mind-wandering and memorability jointly shape visual recognition and recall.
Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The shift of attention from external stimuli toward task-unrelated thoughts (TUTs), or mind-wandering, has been shown to disrupt encoding and subsequent retrieval of information. The present study examined how TUT during encoding affects memory for visual scenes that vary in memorability, an intrinsic stimulus property reflecting the likelihood of recognition across individuals. In Experiment 1, participants studied images of high or low memorability while intermittently reporting their attentional state. A subsequent recognition test revealed independent effects of mind-wandering and memorability on memory performance: TUT during encoding was associated with lower recognition accuracy and high memorability images were better recognized than low memorability images, but there were no interactions. In Experiment 2, we extended this paradigm to free recall using a novel drawing-based methodology. Participants studied and later drew scenes from memory, with recall quantified as the proportion of objects drawn relative to a perception baseline. The results showed that TUT impaired free recall while memorability enhanced free recall. Further evidence suggested that memorability only conferred a benefit to free recall when images were encoded during an on-task state. These findings indicate that both attentional state and image memorability are positively associated with recognition and recall. Although these two factors independently impact recognition, there is some indication that they may interact for recall, suggesting a need for focused attention to harness the mnemonic benefits of highly memorable stimuli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41484759What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.