ArticleApplied biochemistry and biotechnology2026
Identification of Cuproptosis-Associated Biomarker Candidates in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy via Machine Learning and Multi-Omics Integration.
Article in Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a complex genetic disorder characterized by left ventricular hypertrophy and impaired cardiac function. Although progress has been made in understanding its genetic basis, the discovery of novel biomarker candidates and therapeutic targets remains crucial for improving diagnosis and treatment. Recent studies have demonstrated that copper metabolism plays an important role in various diseases, suggesting that copper-related genes (CRGs) may be of significant importance in HCM. In this study, we analyzed bulk RNA-seq and single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) data from healthy controls (HC) and HCM patients. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified through differential expression analysis, and Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses were performed to identify associated pathways. Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) was used to identify gene modules related to the HCM phenotype, and a diagnostic model was constructed based on these modules. Additionally, cell type-specific expression patterns were explored through single-cell analysis, and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) and MR analyses were conducted to evaluate the causal relationships between genes and HCM risk. The study found that DEGs associated with HCM were significantly enriched in pathways related to immune responses. WGCNA identified gene modules highly correlated with HCM, among which the blue module exhibited the strongest correlation with HCM. The diagnostic model constructed based on DEGs and WGCNA module genes demonstrated good diagnostic performance, with FCN3, TIPARP, and PROM1 emerging as potential diagnostic biomarker candidates for HCM. Additionally, single-cell analysis revealed the expression characteristics of different cell types in HCM, and causal relationships between key genes and HCM risk were confirmed through GSEA and MR analyses. This study identified FCN3, TIPARP, and PROM1 as cuproptosis-associated biomarker candidates that showed reproducible expression patterns across cohorts and experimental validation. These findings are associative and hypothesis-generating; they suggest potential diagnostic utility that warrants prospective clinical evaluation and mechanistic studies (e.g., perturbation of copper homeostasis and gene manipulation) before any therapeutic inference can be made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41484731What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.