ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2026
Machine learning model integrating radiomics and clinical features for predicting postoperative bleeding after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveRadiomics and machine learning play significant roles in clinical medical research, particularly in developing prediction models. This study aims to combine radiomic features with clinical variables and apply machine learning to predict the risk of postoperative bleeding after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective study analyzed 151 patients who had PCNL at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University. Clinical variables linked to postoperative bleeding were identified using univariate analysis, and radiomic features were screened using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm (lasso regression). Logistic regression, Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) were then used to develop prediction models based on the correlated clinical variables and radiomic features. The predictive accuracy of these models was assessed through identification and calibration. In addition, the clinical utility of the optimal model was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA), and the significance of each radiomic and clinical feature was elucidated through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to interpret the model's predictions.
resultsPostoperative statistics revealed that the postoperative bleeding rate was 31.1% (n = 47), the blood transfusion rate was 1.99% (n = 3), and the final probability of requiring vascular embolization was 1.32% (n = 2). The accuracy rates for predicting postoperative bleeding in patients with PCNL using logistic regression, RF and SVM were 75.6%, 75.6%, and 71.1%, respectively. The corresponding area under the curve AUC (95% CI) were 0.760 (0.719-0.802), 0.740 (0.691-0.800) and 0.631 (0.558-0.693). The top four prediction importance scores in logistic regression and RF were wavelet-HLH_glrlm_ShortRunLowGrayLevelEmphasis, wavelet-HLH_glrlm_LowGrayLevelRunEmphasis, stone shape, operation time and stone shape, stone diameter, operation time, wavelet-HLH_glrlm_ShortRunLowGrayLevelEmphasis. The DCA decision curve demonstrates that the logistic regression model's prediction of postoperative bleeding offers patients enhanced clinical benefits. The SHAP analysis further clarifies the contribution of each variable in the prediction process
conclusionThe machine learning model has demonstrated excellent performance in predicting the bleeding situation after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. This model may provide a basis for surgical risk stratification, thereby facilitating the development of more personalized postoperative monitoring plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.