ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2026
Dexamethasone implant vs. anti-VEGF for diabetic macular edema with epiretinal membrane: short-term outcomes.
Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiabetic retinopathy frequently coexists with secondary epiretinal membrane (ERM), which may interfere with therapeutic responses in diabetic macular edema (DME). However, consensus on optimal management for DME with concomitant ERM is lacking. This study compared the short-term therapeutic effects of intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implants and anti-VEGF agents in DME eyes with ERM.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 109 eyes of 71 patients treated with either intravitreal anti-VEGF or DEX implant for DME between January 2014 and December 2022. Pre-treatment optical coherence tomography was reviewed. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were recorded at baseline, 2 months, and 4 months after treatment. The primary outcomes were changes in BCVA and CMT between baseline and follow-up after DEX or anti-VEGF therapy.
resultsDEX provided a significantly greater relative reduction in CMT for DME eyes with ERM (β = − 15.675% [5.0]), while no significant difference was observed in eyes without ERM compared to anti-VEGF. Anti-VEGF therapy resulted in significantly less CMT reduction in eyes with ERM than in those without ERM (P < 0.001). DEX implantation led to significant BCVA improvement versus anti-VEGF in DME with ERM (OR = 5.287; 95% CI, 1.100–25.417), whereas no significant difference was found in eyes without ERM (OR = 1.128; 95% CI, 0.232–5.493).
conclusionsDEX therapy achieved superior short-term anatomical and functional outcomes compared to anti-VEGF in DME with ERM, supporting its consideration as a first-line treatment option in this subgroup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.