Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41484661›Full record

ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2026

Sublingual Immunotherapy for Food Allergy: Updates in Safety, Efficacy, and Future Considerations.

Anna A Ilyasova, Edwin H Kim

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anna A IlyasovaUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Edwin H KimDivision of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 5004 Mary Ellen Jones Bldg, 116 Manning Dr, CB8035, 27599, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. edwinkim@email.unc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the reviewWith the continued increase in the prevalence of food allergy and its significant associated medical and financial burden, there is a need for safe and effective treatment options for patients. The goal of this review is to summarize published data on the safety and efficacy of peanut sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) as a potential treatment option for children with food allergy. RECENT

findingsPeanut SLIT has demonstrated clinically significant desensitization across 2 cohorts of children ages 1-11 years. In a study focused on 1-4-year-old peanut-allergic toddlers, even greater levels of desensitization as well as the potential for 3-month remission has been demonstrated. Small studies have also demonstrated potential efficacy with SLIT for other foods such as milk, hazelnut, and peach. Evidence to date supports SLIT as effective and safe and a potential future treatment option for children with food allergy.

Indexed as

AllergensFood HypersensitivityPeanut HypersensitivitySublingual ImmunotherapyArachisChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantTreatment OutcomeAllergensDesensitizationFood allergyPeanut allergySLITSublingual immunotherapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.