SynthesisOdontology2026
In vitro remineralization effectiveness of eggshell extract on human teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the in vitro effectiveness of eggshell extract in remineralizing enamel, focusing on outcomes, such as microhardness, surface roughness, and calcium/phosphate (Ca/P) ratios. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for studies published between January 2005 and October 2024. Seventeen eligible in vitro studies involving extracted human or bovine teeth were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUIN tool. Meta-analysis using a random-effects model showed that eggshell extract significantly improved enamel microhardness (Cohen's d = 0.45, 95% CI 0.30-0.60, p < 0.05) and reduced surface roughness (Cohen's d = - 0.50, 95% CI - 0.70 to - 0.30, p < 0.01). The Ca/P ratio also improved. Moderate heterogeneity (I
Indexed as
Identifiers
41484659What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.