ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2026
A model for predicting the likelihood of negative culture results in children with osteoarticular infections.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBlood and pus culture are still considered standard methods for etiological investigations on osteoarticular infection (OAI) in children, but negative culture results are common and may increase the complexity of disease diagnosis and treatment. This study aims to explore the clinical characteristics and risk factors of culture-negative OAI and construct a prediction model for determining the likelihood of negative culture results.
methodsThis single-center retrospective analysis included pediatric OAI cases diagnosed between 2014 and 2023. Demographic data, clinical features, and laboratory parameters were systematically collected. Comparisons were made between culture-positive and culture-negative groups for both blood and pus cultures. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of negative culture results, which were used to develop a nomogram-based predictive model. The discriminatory ability of the model was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves, while its calibration was evaluated through the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test and bootstrap calibration plots. The clinical utility of the model was determined using decision curve analysis.
resultsThis study included 345 children diagnosed with OAI: blood culture was performed in 243 cases (38 culture-positive and 205 culture-negative), and pus culture was performed in 230 cases (115 culture-positive and 115 culture-negative). In the blood culture group, C-reactive protein (CRP) was identified as an independent predictor of negative blood culture. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis based on CRP demonstrated a sensitivity of 73.7% and a specificity of 70.2% for predicting culture results. In the pus culture group, presence of septic arthritis, neutrophil percentage, and CRP level were identified as independent predictors of pus culture outcomes. The nomogram constructed using these predictors demonstrated good discriminative ability, calibration, and clinical utility.
conclusionCRP was identified as a key predictor of negative blood culture results. The presence of septic arthritis, neutrophil percentage, and CRP was identified as a key predictor of negative pus culture results. The nomogram constructed with pus culture predictors had good discrimination and clinical applicability and has potential for the early identification of culture-negative OAI cases in the clinic. This tool could optimize etiological investigation strategies and improve the efficiency of clinical diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.