ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2026
Impact of dose and compliance of antidementia medications on long-term outcomes in Alzheimer's disease: a nationwide real-world study.
Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntidementia medications are widely prescribed for Alzheimer's disease (AD), but their long-term real-world effectiveness remains uncertain. This study investigated whether long-term outcomes differ according to medication dosage and compliance using nationwide data.
methodsData from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) covering 47 million individuals were analyzed. Prescription data for acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and memantine were analyzed for dosage and compliance. Among 1,704,547 dementia cases (2010-2016), 466,773 patients with clinically diagnosed AD were included. Medication dosage and compliance during the first three years after diagnosis were categorized to define optimal versus suboptimal treatment. Clinical outcomes included progression to moderate to severe dementia, institutionalization, and mortality. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with outcomes.
resultsPatients who maintained optimal dosage and compliance during the first three years after diagnosis showed a lower rate of progression to moderate to severe dementia than those receiving suboptimal treatments consistently across all classification criteria. Regression analyses revealed that optimal compliance and dosage were strongly associated with reduced progression (OR 0.807 and 0.704, respectively; p < 0.0001) and early mortality within five years. In contrast, mortality and institutionalization rates were not significantly different between groups except that mortality within five years.
conclusionsBoth medication dosage and persistence were independently associated with better long-term outcomes in AD. Maintaining optimal treatment during the early disease period may delay disease progression and improve survival within five years. This nationwide real-world study provides robust evidence supporting the importance of sustained, adequate antidementia therapy in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.