ArticlePlant methods2026
Integrated experimental and computational workflows for single-cell transcriptomics in plants.
Article in Plant methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSingle-cell transcriptomics is a powerful approach to resolve cellular heterogeneity, yet its application in plants is constrained by challenges in tissue preparation, nuclei isolation, and transcriptome quality. Optimized experimental and computational workflows are essential to achieve robust results in plant systems.
resultsWe systematically benchmarked bulk and single-cell transcriptomic workflows in maize and established an integrated, optimized framework. First, we developed an improved bulk RNA-seq protocol, providing higher consistency and serving as a reference for single-cell datasets. Second, we compared three input types, protoplasts, fresh nuclei, and frozen nuclei, across tissues, demonstrating overall comparability of their transcriptomic profiles and offering guidance for studies with limited material. Third, by leveraging bulk RNA-seq as a reference, these complementary data provide additional biological context that helps to interpret and validate findings derived from single-cell transcriptomic analyses. A combination of these strategies resulted in high transcriptome integrity and clear clustering resolution in the final dataset, supporting robust identification of plant cell types. While all experimental data are derived from maize, the principles and strategies described here provide practical guidance and inspiration for single-cell studies in other plant species.
conclusionsOur study establishes optimized experimental and computational workflows for plant single-cell transcriptomics. By validating input comparability and addressing the limitations of nuclear data, we provide methodological guidance that extends beyond maize and supports future single-cell investigations across diverse plant species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.