ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Is the tip-apex distance a reliable predictor of implant failure in surgical fixation of femoral neck fractures with the synthes femoral neck system device?
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Tip-Apex Distance (TAD) is known to affect outcomes of traditional implants such as sliding hip screws (SHS). However, it is unclear if the TAD has the same effect on the Femoral Neck System (FNS). This study aimed to assess if the TAD is a predictor of FNS failure and report outcomes of FNS at our institution.
methodsThis retrospective, single-centre study included 46 patients who underwent FNS for femoral neck fractures (FNF) between 2017 and 2022. Radiographic and clinical factors were analysed. Outcomes reported include intra-operative duration, length of hospitalization and failure rate. Failure was defined as the presence of complications like cut-out, breakage, avascular necrosis (AVN) or neck shortening. Scale data were analysed with Unpaired Student T-test and Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical data were assessed with Pearson χ2 or Fischer's exact test where appropriate. Binary logistic regression was performed for risk factors.
resultsMean age was 69.6 years old. Mean follow-up was 20.4 months. Median operation duration was 53.5 minutes. Median length of stay was 9 days. Failure rate was 15.2% (n = 7), consisting of two cut-outs, three AVN, one neck shortening and one distal screw breakage. Re-operation rate was 8.7% (n = 4). Mean TAD was 16.8 mm and 18.1 mm in the failure and non-failure groups respectively (P = 0.431) and was not a significant risk factor for failure on logistic regression testing (p = 0.444). Osteoporotic BMD value was more prevalent in the failure group (71.4%) but was not a significant risk factor for failure on logistic regression (P = 0.056). Quality of reduction, age, body mass index (BMI) and pre-operative Garden's score were also insignificant on logistic regression. (P > 0.05)
conclusionThe TAD is not a reliable predictor of FNS implant failure for treatment of FNFs. Overall, the FNS is a reliable device with a low failure rate, a short operative time, and a short length of stay comparable to that reported in the literature and with traditional implants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.