ArticleBMC cancer2026
Predicting PD-L1 expression in advanced EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients using NECT, CECT radiomics and clinical features.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CT-based radiomics as a non-invasive virtual biopsy for high PD-L1 expression prediction in non-small cell lung cancer.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesRecent studies have applied machine-learning radiomics to predict EGFR mutations or PD-L1 expression, yet little is known about PD-L1 prediction specifically in EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma, despite evidence linking high PD-L1 expression to TKI resistance. To address this gap, this study integrates CT radiomics features with clinical data to develop and validate interpretable models for predicting PD-L1 expression in advanced EGFR-mutant LUAD and identifying key predictive determinants. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this single-center study, we retrospectively collected the pretreatment CT images, including non-contrast enhanced CT (NECT) and contrast enhanced CT (CECT), as well as clinical information from a cohort consisting of 165 EGFR-Mutant LUAD patients consecutively staged at IIIB-IVB between January 2020 and May 2022. After feature extraction and selection, six machine learning algorithms (Logistic regression, Linear discriminate analysis, Supporter vector machine, Gradient boosting, Random forest and adaptive boosting) were employed to construct the models. Model performances were assessed using 5-fold cross-validation and then visualized using coefficient matrices and SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) to interpret the models’ predictions.
resultsA total of 30 radiomics features and 4 clinical features were selected. Models using radiomics features alone achieved the highest area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.91, and the combination of radiomics and clinical features models showed similar predictive performance with an AUC value of 0.90. However, the clinical features models exhibited insufficient predictive ability and poor generalizability (AUC = 0.64). According to the coefficient matrices, the top 5 features associated with PD-L1 ≥ 1% were: cect-wavelet-LHH-gldm-DependenceVariance, nect-wavelet-LHL-glcm-MCC, nect-wavelet-LHL-glrlm-LRLGLE, cect-wavelet-LLH-glcm-Imc2 and cect-wavelet-LLH-firstorder-Skewness, which was consistent with the results form SHAP.
conclusionOur study demonstrated that radiomics and clinical features via machine learning method offer a noninvasive approach to predict the PD-L1 expression status in EGFR-mutant LUAD patients. The model shows potential as a noninvasive tool to support immunotherapy decision-making and lays the groundwork for future clinical validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.