ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Disability, disclosure, and missed opportunities: a qualitative study of perinatal intimate partner violence screening.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Disability, race, and risk of perinatal intimate partner violence: Findings from a nationally representative U.S. sample.Disability and health journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntimate partner violence (IPV) during the perinatal period is a significant public health issue. Persons with disabilities (PWD) experience higher rates of IPV yet are less likely to be screened, and little is known about their experiences with screening and interventions. This study explored perinatal IPV screening experiences among PWD in the United States.
methodsAs part of a mixed method study on psychosocial risks and maternal-infant outcomes among PWD, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 45 pregnant or recently pregnant PWD. Twenty-two participants reported experiencing or having experienced current or recent IPV. Interviews addressed pregnancy health, healthcare experiences, IPV screening, interventions, and care recommendations. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify key themes.
resultsAnalysis revealed three key themes. First, participants described silence, fear, and stigma as barriers to disclosure, often minimizing abuse or feeling ashamed, particularly in the absence of direct and empathetic assessment by healthcare providers. Second, participants reported missed opportunities and gaps in healthcare provider response, including superficial screening, limited follow-up, and experiences of bias or discrimination, which reinforced isolation and hindered access to support. Third, participants highlighted the transformative power of supportive care, noting that providers who listened attentively, validated their experiences, and connected them to resources promoted safety, empowerment, and engagement with care.
conclusionsPersons with disabilities face unique barriers to IPV disclosure during the perinatal period, and current screening practices are often insufficient. Embedding IPV screening within trauma-informed and disability-informed care can enhance disclosure, improve access to resources, and promote maternal and infant health. Health systems should implement tailored screening approaches, healthcare provider training, and systemic supports to ensure appropriate IPV identification and response for PWD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.