Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41484562›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

Disability, disclosure, and missed opportunities: a qualitative study of perinatal intimate partner violence screening.

Jeanne L Alhusen, Rosemary B Hughes, Kathryn Laughon, Jamille Prevete, Maria McDonald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jeanne L AlhusenUniversity of Virginia, School of Nursing, 225 Jeanette Lancaster Avenue, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA. Jla7e@virginia.edu.
Rosemary B HughesUniversity of Montana, Rural Institute for Inclusive Communities, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA.
Kathryn LaughonUniversity of Virginia, School of Nursing, 225 Jeanette Lancaster Avenue, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
Jamille PreveteUniversity of Virginia, School of Nursing, 225 Jeanette Lancaster Avenue, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
Maria McDonaldUniversity of Virginia, School of Nursing, 225 Jeanette Lancaster Avenue, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.

Funding

Psychosocial stress and its relation to maternal and infant outcomes among women with disabilitiesR01HD102927 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI ALHUSEN, JEANNE L · 2021 to 2025
$2.3M
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R01HD117164NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD102927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntimate partner violence (IPV) during the perinatal period is a significant public health issue. Persons with disabilities (PWD) experience higher rates of IPV yet are less likely to be screened, and little is known about their experiences with screening and interventions. This study explored perinatal IPV screening experiences among PWD in the United States.

methodsAs part of a mixed method study on psychosocial risks and maternal-infant outcomes among PWD, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 45 pregnant or recently pregnant PWD. Twenty-two participants reported experiencing or having experienced current or recent IPV. Interviews addressed pregnancy health, healthcare experiences, IPV screening, interventions, and care recommendations. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify key themes.

resultsAnalysis revealed three key themes. First, participants described silence, fear, and stigma as barriers to disclosure, often minimizing abuse or feeling ashamed, particularly in the absence of direct and empathetic assessment by healthcare providers. Second, participants reported missed opportunities and gaps in healthcare provider response, including superficial screening, limited follow-up, and experiences of bias or discrimination, which reinforced isolation and hindered access to support. Third, participants highlighted the transformative power of supportive care, noting that providers who listened attentively, validated their experiences, and connected them to resources promoted safety, empowerment, and engagement with care.

conclusionsPersons with disabilities face unique barriers to IPV disclosure during the perinatal period, and current screening practices are often insufficient. Embedding IPV screening within trauma-informed and disability-informed care can enhance disclosure, improve access to resources, and promote maternal and infant health. Health systems should implement tailored screening approaches, healthcare provider training, and systemic supports to ensure appropriate IPV identification and response for PWD.

Indexed as

DisclosureIntimate Partner ViolenceMass ScreeningPerinatal CarePersons with DisabilitiesAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyQualitative ResearchSocial StigmaUnited StatesYoung AdultDisabilityIntimate partner violenceIntimate partner violence screeningPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID41484562
PMCPMC12866167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.