Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41484541›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2026

Compensatory Effects of Affectionate Communication in Marriages with Infrequent Sexual Activity.

Jeong Eun Cheon, Young-Hoon Kim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeong Eun CheonDepartment of Psychology, Yonsei University, #209 Yu Eok-gyeom Memorial Hall, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemum-gu, Seoul, 120-749, South Korea.
Young-Hoon KimDepartment of Psychology, Yonsei University, #209 Yu Eok-gyeom Memorial Hall, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemum-gu, Seoul, 120-749, South Korea. younghoonkim@yonsei.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-0167-749X

Funding

Yonsei University Yonsei University Research Grant of 2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Affection exchange theory posits that affectionate communication is crucial in fostering relational bonds and facilitating procreation. Building on this theory, this study examined whether affectionate communication is positively related to sexual satisfaction. Furthermore, considering that affectionate communication partially satisfies the need for sexual intimacy among couples, this study investigated whether affectionate exchanges compensated for infrequent sexual activity. Specifically, it assessed whether affectionate communication's frequency moderated the association between sexual frequency and sexual and marital satisfaction, such that couples engaging in frequent affectionate communication exhibit less reduction in well-being when sexual activity is infrequent. These hypotheses were tested by collecting data from 700 married individuals in South Korea. The findings revealed that affectionate communication mitigated the negative association between infrequent sexual activity and sexual and marital satisfaction. Notably, receiving affection from one's partner and expressing affection toward one's partner attenuated the association between sexual frequency and satisfaction levels. These findings underscore affectionate communication's importance in maintaining sexual and marital satisfaction, particularly in relationships characterized by lower sexual frequency.

Indexed as

CommunicationInterpersonal RelationsMarriagePersonal SatisfactionSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersSpousesAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRepublic of KoreaYoung AdultAffectionate communicationMarriageRelationship satisfactionSexual behaviorSexual satisfaction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.