ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2026
Examining the Cerebral-Cerebellar Connectivity During Spelling Tasks.
Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The cerebellum has long been implicated in language processes, but its precise role in spelling subcomponents such as orthographic retrieval and phoneme-grapheme conversion planning remains underexplored. We used task-based fMRI and functional connectivity (FC) analyses to investigate cerebral-cerebellar cooperation during three in-scanner spelling conditions that differentially taxed print, and sound processes in 33 adults with and without reading impairments. ROI-to-ROI analyses identified robust cerebral-cerebellar connectivity across all conditions, with task-specific engagement of cerebellar regions in right lobule VI and Crus II. Despite marked behavioral differences between typical and impaired readers, including lower spelling accuracy and slower response times in the impaired group, no significant group differences in cerebral-cerebellar FC were observed. Generalized psychophysiological interaction (gPPI) analyses revealed unique cerebral-cerebellar connectivity patterns associated with sublexical processing (e.g., left supramarginal gyrus to right lobule VIb) in the phonological task, but not in the orthographic condition. These findings support a dynamic and context-dependent cerebellar role in language processing and suggest that cerebellar contributions to spelling involve integrative cooperation with cerebral language regions regardless of reading proficiency. This study reinforces the need to consider cerebellar-cortical networks in models of reading and dyslexia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41484532What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.