ReviewUpdates in surgery2026
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and pancreatic surgery in the 21st century: triumphs, turning points, and unresolved challenges.
Review in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Post-Pancreatectomy Acute Pancreatitis in Pancreatic Cancer: A Single-Center Experience.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Outcomes in pancreatic cancer surgery have been constrained by high operative risks and by the unfavorable biological behavior of most pancreatic neoplasms. This narrative review summarizes the major developments that have reshaped the surgical management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma over the past twenty-five years and highlights their interaction with advances in oncologic therapies. Although no single innovation has been decisively transformative, the overall quality of care has improved substantially. The introduction of objective scoring systems has standardized the classification of postoperative complications and enhanced the accuracy of perioperative risk assessment. Combined with technical refinements and improved perioperative management, these tools have contributed to a measurable reduction in postoperative mortality. In parallel, progress in oncologic therapies has increased five-year survival from less than 5% to approximately 13%. From a surgical standpoint, important progress includes the adoption of minimally invasive procedures, recently advanced by robotics, and the incorporation of venous and arterial resections within prognosis-based resectability strategies. Nonetheless, the full potential of these approaches has yet to be defined, as most data originate from centers still completing the required learning curves. Optimal management of pancreatic tumors requires care in dedicated pancreas units within broader networks that centralize patients to hospitals meeting the logistical, technological, cultural, and professional standards needed to deliver the full range of treatments, from palliation to the most advanced oncologic interventions. For borderline-resectable and locally advanced tumors, centralization should consider not only institutional volume but also the specific technical expertise required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41484523What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.