Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41484520›Full record

ArticleDiscover nano2026

Enhanced plasmonic biosensors with machine learning for ultra-sensitive detection.

M Sahaya Sheela, A Ponraj, S Kumarganesh, B Thiyaneswaran, P Rishabavarthani, I Rajesh, Binay Kumar Pandey, Digvijay Pandey, Mesfin Esayas Lelisho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover nano, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

M Sahaya SheelaDepartment of ECE, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India.
A PonrajDepartment of ECE, Easwari Engineering College, Chennai,, Tamil Nadu, India.
S KumarganeshDepartment of ECE, Knowledge Institute of Technology, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
B ThiyaneswaranDepartment of ECE, Sona College of Technology, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
P RishabavarthaniDepartment of ECE, Sri Ramakrishna Engineering College, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
I RajeshDepartment of CSE, Knowledge Institute of Technology, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
Binay Kumar PandeyDepartment of Information Technology, College of Technology, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology Pantnagar, Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand, India. binaydece@gmail.com.
Digvijay PandeyDepartment of Technical Education Uttar Pradesh, (Government of U.P.), Lucknow, India.
Mesfin Esayas LelishoDepartment of Statistics, College of Natural and Computational Science, Mizan-Tepi University, Tepi, Ethiopia. mesfinesayas@mtu.edu.et.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plasmonic biosensors, particularly Surface Plasmon Resonance and Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy, have gained significant attention for real-time, label-free biochemical detection. However, optimizing these sensors for maximum sensitivity and selectivity remains a challenge due to their complex plasmonic interactions with different biomolecules. This work proposes SERA, an AI driven framework that integrates machine learning algorithms with experimental Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) data for the predictive modeling and optimization of plasmonic sensing performance. Using supervised learning techniques, the ML models are trained on a spectral dataset - SERS-DB obtained from various plasmonic nanostructures. The model predicts key parameters such as resonance shift, intensity variations, and molecular binding efficiency, allowing for rapid optimization of biosensor designs without extensive trial-and-error experimentation. This approach accelerates plasmonic biosensor development and enables real-time adaptive sensing based on live data. The results through evaluation on the SERS-DB database with 420 samples for training and 180 for the testing phase, 6 classes like Thiacloprid, Imidacloprid, Thiamethoxam, Nitenpyram, Tetrahydrofolate, and Dihydrofolate, an accuracy of 92%, precision & recall of 90%, and F1-score of 92% were attained. The SERA model excelled with an overall score of around 0.90 in all 6 classes, proving additional superiority in biosensing applications. Further comparative analysis of the proposed approach with conventional methods underscores the best performance in accuracy with 92%, sensitivity, 1000 nm/RIU, and 95% in optimization efficiency. Overall, this research highlights a scalable and cost-effective strategy for advancing biosensor technology in medical diagnostics, environmental monitoring, and bio photonics.

Indexed as

Bayesian optimizationBio photonicsBiosensorMachine learningPlasmonic biosensorsRandom forestSensitivitySurface enhanced raman spectroscopySurface plasmon resonanceUltra-sensitive detection

Identifiers

PMID41484520
PMCPMC12764726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.