ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2026
Research Priorities and Future Directions in Cardio-Oncology.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing cancer therapeutics: new perspectives on mechanisms, regulatory and policy challenges, and innovative multi-modality strategies for the early detection of cardiotoxicity.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementThe subspecialty of cardio-oncology has undergone significant growth in recent years, alongside major advances in the management of both cardiovascular disease and cancer, the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the United States and many countries around the world. Contemporary clinical guidelines and scientific statements have outlined evidence-based strategies for reducing the risk of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity among cancer survivors across the treatment continuum. These approaches broadly include tailoring assessment and treatment of shared risk factors before therapy; minimizing cardiac radiation exposure, integrating baseline and repeat echocardiography for those receiving anthracyclines and targeted therapies, and assessing troponins and electrocardiography for patients starting immune checkpoint inhibitors during therapy; and considering long-term cardiac surveillance and promoting healthy lifestyle behaviors after therapy. This review outlines key evidence gaps and future directions in cardio-oncology with an emphasis on contemporary trends in cardiovascular disease and cancer risk factors, current and novel approaches for risk estimation and stratification, innovative clinical trials and largescale observational registries, quality-of-care metrics and cardio-oncology rehabilitation, social determinants of health and health equity, and artificial intelligence and machine learning for precision medicine. As the number of cancer survivors continues to grow and is projected to exceed 26 million by 2040, multidisciplinary collaboration between cardiology, oncology, and other health disciplines is critical to not only improve individuals' health outcomes and quality of life associated with cardiovascular disease and cancer, but also to further elucidate the bi-directional relationship and underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms underpinning both chronic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41484494What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.