ArticleScientific reports2026
Deterministic nowcasting of geostationary satellite infrared brightness temperature using 3D U-Net diffusion model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present a generative modeling approach for nowcasting infrared (IR) brightness temperatures (Tb) from geostationary satellite observations (~ 10.8 μm) that couples a denoising diffusion probabilistic model with a 3D U-Net backbone. Using SEVIRI observations, the model ingests six hours of IR history and produces six-hour nowcasts at 15-min resolution. Deterministic evaluation is performed on an independent July-September 2022 test set and benchmarked against 3D U-Net, ConvLSTM, and Optical Flow extrapolation baselines. The diffusion model enhances prediction accuracy, yielding lower errors and higher correlation than all baselines across most forecast lead times, with a persistent advantage through the 2-hour lead time and reduced but still evident gains at longer leads. We complement the statistical assessments with a perceptual and a probabilistic diagnostic; diffusion achieves the highest SSIM at all leads and the lowest CRPS among all models (CRPS generates MAE for deterministic baselines). RAPSD analysis shows improved retention of high-frequency variance relative to deep learning baselines while avoiding the texture-only limitations of Optical Flow. Spatial maps demonstrate that our diffusion model significantly outperforms the baselines, indicating smaller errors over the study region. Two case studies show coherent structures in Tb forecasts, sharper gradients, and improved localization of evolving cold features. Overall, coupling diffusion with 3D U-Net delivers more structurally faithful satellite nowcasts than traditional extrapolation and deep learning baselines, particularly at short to intermediate leads.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.