Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41484445›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A hybrid framework of hesitant fuzzy soft sets and rough sets for uncertainty modelling.

Jahanvi, Dinesh Kumar Nishad, Rashmi Singh, Saifullah Khalid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

JahanviDepartment of Mathematics, AIAS, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Noida, India.
Dinesh Kumar NishadDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Dr. Shakuntala Misra National Rehabilitation University, Lucknow, UP, India.
Rashmi SinghDepartment of Mathematics, AIAS, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Noida, India. rsingh7@amity.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6139-466X
Saifullah KhalidIBM Multi Activities Co. Ltd. Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan. skhalid.sudan@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of decision making involves uncertainty due to lack of agreement among experts, inaccuracy in measurements and incomplete information. Current frameworks are inadequate in dealing with cases in which hesitation, indiscernibility, and parameterization may all take place simultaneously. The article proposes a new Hesitant Fuzzy Soft Rough Set (HFSRS) model that combines hesitant fuzzy soft sets and rough sets with dynamic [Formula: see text] covers that changes approximation boundaries in relation to hesitant membership levels. The suggested framework deals with severe constraints such as the impossibility to model parameter-dependent hesitation, duality violation of the classical fuzzy rough sets, and fixed thresholding processes that cannot be used in a noisy environment. The three fundamental properties provided by mathematical formalization: (a) duality preservation to provide logical consistency important for safety-critical applications, (b) monotonicity to provide predictable behavior important to explainable AI systems, and (c) topological consistency to provide hierarchical uncertainty modeling. HFSRS is empirically validated using synthetically generated datasets (500 photovoltaic modules with three fault indicators adjusted to IEC 61215-2:2021 standards) to achieve 92 per cent accuracy versus 85 per cent on classical rough sets, 86 per cent on fuzzy rough sets, 88 per cent on intuitionistic fuzzy rough sets, with 35 per cent reduction in boundary region and AUC of 0.97 versus 0.92 on competing methods running 30 times The best 0.65 -threshold of the beta value balances accuracy and coverage. The HFSRS-TOPSIS algorithm provides practitioners with strong decision support, computational tractability of [Formula: see text] on a dataset of up to [Formula: see text] objects.

Indexed as

Approximation operatorsCoveringDecision makingHesitant fuzzy soft setsRough setsUncertainty modeling

Identifiers

PMID41484445
PMCPMC12858791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.