ArticleScientific reports2026
Sociospatial analysis of indoor bioaerosol variation across diverse residential zones in Jodhpur.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A prospective longitudinal study was conducted to characterize and quantify the distribution of bacterial and fungal bioaerosols across varied residential zones in Jodhpur, India, a semi-arid city prone to dust storms and poor ambient air quality. Twelve households were selected from six different land-use categories (slum, low-, middle-, and high-income, commercial, and industrial). Bioaerosol samples were collected from five indoor and outdoor location during four seasons (July, November, February, and May) using passive air sampling. Bacterial counts peaked during the monsoon (July), with slum and industrial households showing the highest concentrations, particularly in kitchens and bathrooms. Fungal counts were most prominent in low-income and commercial areas. Aspergillus and Penicillium were the most frequently isolated fungal genera. Although statistically significant differences in bacterial and fungal counts were observed across certain sites and seasons, these variations did not follow a consistent trend across all households. Morphological identification revealed medically significant genera such as Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Proteus, indicating potential health risks. This is one of the first studies to assess residential indoor bioaerosols in a semi-arid Indian city. The findings reveal spatial and seasonal variation in microbial exposure, emphasizing the need for routine indoor air quality monitoring and targeted public health interventions, especially in overcrowded or poorly ventilated homes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.