ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Grounded report generation for enhancing ophthalmic ultrasound interpretation using Vision-Language Segmentation models.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An autonomous multimodal AI agent for evidence-grounded ophthalmic diagnosis.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluation of large language models and retrieval-augmented generation for clinical reasoning in pediatric myopia: a 50-case real-world study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Evaluating large language model clinical reasoning in glaucoma using retrieval-augmented generation.Advances in ophthalmology practice and researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate interpretation of ophthalmic ultrasound is crucial for diagnosing eye conditions but remains time-consuming and requires significant expertise. With the increasing volume of ultrasound data, there is a need for Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems capable of efficiently analyzing images and generating reports. Traditional AI models for report generation cannot simultaneously identify lesions and lack interpretability. This study proposes the Vision-Language Segmentation (VLS) model, combining Vision-Language Model (VLM) with the Segment Anything Model (SAM) to improve interpretability in ophthalmic ultrasound imaging. Using data from three hospitals, totaling 64,098 images and 21,355 reports, the VLS model achieved a BLEU4 score of 66.37 in internal test set, and 85.36 and 73.77 in external test sets. The model achieved a mean dice coefficient of 59.6% in internal test set, and dice coefficients of 50.2% and 51.5% with specificity values of 97.8% and 97.7% in external test sets, respectively. Overall diagnostic accuracy was 90.59% in internal and 71.87% in external test sets. A cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrated a 30-fold reduction in report costs, from $39 per report by senior ophthalmologists to $1.3 for VLS. This approach enhances diagnostic accuracy, reduces manual effort, and accelerates workflows, offering a promising solution for ophthalmic ultrasound interpretation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.