Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41484436›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026

Grounded report generation for enhancing ophthalmic ultrasound interpretation using Vision-Language Segmentation models.

Kai Jin, Qixuan Sun, Daohuan Kang, Ziyao Luo, Tao Yu, Wenzheng Han, Yi Zhang, Meng Wang, Danli Shi, Andrzej Grzybowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kai JinEye Center of Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. jinkai@zju.edu.cn.
Qixuan SunDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Daohuan KangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, China.
Ziyao LuoEye Center of Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Tao YuEye Center of Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Wenzheng HanThe First Affiliated Hospital, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China.
Yi ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, China.
Meng WangCentre for Innovation and Precision Eye Health, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Danli ShiSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Andrzej GrzybowskiInstitute for Research in Ophthalmology, Foundation for Ophthalmology Development, Poznan, Poland.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82201195
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate interpretation of ophthalmic ultrasound is crucial for diagnosing eye conditions but remains time-consuming and requires significant expertise. With the increasing volume of ultrasound data, there is a need for Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems capable of efficiently analyzing images and generating reports. Traditional AI models for report generation cannot simultaneously identify lesions and lack interpretability. This study proposes the Vision-Language Segmentation (VLS) model, combining Vision-Language Model (VLM) with the Segment Anything Model (SAM) to improve interpretability in ophthalmic ultrasound imaging. Using data from three hospitals, totaling 64,098 images and 21,355 reports, the VLS model achieved a BLEU4 score of 66.37 in internal test set, and 85.36 and 73.77 in external test sets. The model achieved a mean dice coefficient of 59.6% in internal test set, and dice coefficients of 50.2% and 51.5% with specificity values of 97.8% and 97.7% in external test sets, respectively. Overall diagnostic accuracy was 90.59% in internal and 71.87% in external test sets. A cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrated a 30-fold reduction in report costs, from $39 per report by senior ophthalmologists to $1.3 for VLS. This approach enhances diagnostic accuracy, reduces manual effort, and accelerates workflows, offering a promising solution for ophthalmic ultrasound interpretation.

Identifiers

PMID41484436
PMCPMC12859100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.