Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41484419›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Transforming free-text coronary angiography reports into structured, analyzable data using large language models.

Ji Woo Song, Ji Yong Jang, Hyeongsoo Kim, Young-Guk Ko, Seng Chan You

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ji Woo SongYonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5569-9930
Ji Yong JangDivision of Cardiology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2842-7500
Hyeongsoo KimDivision of Cardiology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5030-952X
Young-Guk KoDepartment of Cardiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7748-5788
Seng Chan YouYonsei Institute for Digital Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea. chandryou@yuhs.ac.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5052-6399

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development Institute HI22C0452Korea Health Industry Development Institute MD-Phd/Medical Scientist Training Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary angiography (CAG) reports contain many details about coronary anatomy, lesion characteristics, and interventional procedures. However, their free-text format limits their research utility. Therefore, we sought to develop and validate a framework leveraging large language models (LLMs) to convert CAG reports automatically into a standardized structured format. Using 50 CAG reports from a tertiary hospital, we developed a multi-step framework to standardize and extract key information from CAG reports. First, a standard annotation schema was developed by cardiologists. Thereafter, an LLM (GPT-4o) converted the free-text CAG reports into the hierarchical annotation schema in a standardized format. Finally, clinically relevant information was extracted from the standardized schema. One hundred CAG reports from each of two hospitals were used for internal and external test, respectively. The 12 key information points included four CAG-related (previous stent information, lesion characteristics, and anatomical diagnosis) and eight percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-related key points (complex PCI criteria and current stent information). For internal test, two interventional cardiologists independently extracted information, with discrepancies resolved through consensus, as reference standard. Based on the reference standard, the proposed framework demonstrated superior accuracy for CAG-related (99.5% vs. 91.8%; p < 0.001) and comparable accuracy for PCI-related key points (98.3% vs. 97.4%; p = 0.512) in the internal test. External test confirmed high accuracy for both CAG- (96.2%) and PCI-related key points (99.4%). This framework demonstrated excellent accuracy in standardizing free-text CAG reports, potentially enabling more efficient utilization of detailed clinical data for cardiovascular research.

Indexed as

Coronary AngiographyHumansLarge Language ModelsPercutaneous Coronary InterventionArtificial intelligenceCoronary angiographyDatabasePercutaneous coronary interventionStandardization

Identifiers

PMID41484419
PMCPMC12816740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.