ArticleScientific reports2026
Integration of patient-reported outcomes and myokine profiling for the detection of physical inactivity in COPD: an exploratory multicentre study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physical inactivity strongly predicts poor prognosis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but is often underrecognized. We investigated whether combining patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with myokine profiling enhances detection of inactivity in COPD. In this multicentre cross-sectional study, 73 patients with stable COPD underwent PRO assessment (modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (mMRC), dyspnea-specific PROs (PROMs-D), COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Shortness of Breath Daily Activities Questionnaire (SOBDA-Q), and Kihon Checklist (KCL)), serum myokine measurement, and accelerometer-based physical activity evaluation, stratified into 1.0-1.5 METs (low-intensity/sedentary), ≥ 3.0 METs (moderate), total activity (METs·h), and step count. Correlation and logistic regression analyses were performed. mMRC and PROMs-D correlated negatively with moderate activity and step count. Among myokines, growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), fatty acid binding protein 3 (FABP3), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) showed moderate associations with physical activity: GDF-15 and BDNF with low-intensity, GDF-15 with moderate, and FABP3 and BDNF with step count. Combined PRO-myokine models outperformed single markers, with areas under the curve of 0.77 for low-intensity activity, 0.82 for moderate activity, and 0.86 for step count. In conclusion, integrating PROs and myokines improves the specificity and accuracy of inactivity detection in COPD. This multidimensional strategy may facilitate early, personalized interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.