ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2026
Population Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Cefuroxime in Plasma and Bone of Patients with Prosthetic Joint Infection: Is There Room for Dose Optimization?
Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveProsthetic joint infections are serious infections that require perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Cefuroxime may be used as prophylaxis, and this study aims to evaluate the current dosing regimen to prevent infection during the perioperative period by performing population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of plasma and bone in patients with prosthetic joint infection (PJI).
methodsBoth plasma and bone samples were taken perioperatively and analyzed using NONMEM. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to determine the probability of target attainment (PTA) in both plasma and bone of various dosing regimens.
resultsA total of 44 plasma and 38 bone samples from 25 patients were included. The median bone concentration at 30-60 min after administration was 18.2 (9.9-25.3) mg/L and the bone-to-plasma ratio was 0.269 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.179-0.269), while the median bone concentration at 90-120 min after administration was 12.6 (5.9-18.6) mg/L and the bone-to-plasma ratio was 0.125 (IQR 0.073-0.160). A two-compartment model with allometric scaling and proportional errors best described plasma and bone concentrations. Only estimated glomerular filtration rate could partly explain the inter-individual variability (IIV) of clearance (CL). A single dose of 1500 mg cefuroxime failed to maintain bone concentrations above target concentrations for Staphylococcus aureus beyond 3.83 h post administration.
conclusionA population PK model was developed to characterize the disposition of cefuroxime in both plasma and bone compartments. Although adequate cefuroxime bone penetration within 1 h was observed in patients with PJI with rapid clearance, simulations predicted less optimal levels of cefuroxime after 3.5 h. The clinical implications need to be researched and confirmed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41484345What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.